Scramble "Wave" BJJ Gi
1 review
This item is not currently available for purchase.
  • 550 gsm pearl weave jacket
  • Incredibly soft and smooth jacket lining wicks away sweat and keeps you comfortable
  • Lightweight cotton pants
  • Navy blue trim and embroideries

The 2nd Gi release from Scramble has been impressing fans since the first sneak peeks were released. Now that it's here, don't miss out on your Wave Kimono... it's even more impressive in person. The 550 gsm pearl weave jacket has a very clean looking white finish. The arms have Scramble Kimonos embroidered in navy blue, along with navy blue side vents. Inside the jacket is where this BJJ Gi really starts to shine. A lightweight rashguard-esque fabric lines the interior, fully sublimated and highly detailed... using the famous Hokusai artwork. The pants are lightweight cotton with subtle navy blue highlights and trim. Scramble Kimonos is embroidered on the right shin.

Discuss this item

Good Gi.

Good quality gi. Nice workman ship and good quality materials. The lining does make it warm to train in warmer climates but it looks cool.   
by: Burnaby BJJ   
7/27/2013 6:15:20 PM
Big boy sizes

So when are you going to have this Gi in big boy sizes? I would order an A5 right now if you offered it.  
by: smiley   
3/3/2013 10:42:06 PM
This is a rarer gi model so restocks are less frequent than our more standard items. We don't have any restocks currently on the way.
by: okiken108     
3/4/2013 11:42:38 PM
Was this helpful? (0) (0)

when will there be size A2?  
by: Juan Caballero   
10/19/2012 3:11:47 PM
This is a specialty item that scramble doesn't produce as much as their standard models. We'll have to wait until they decide to run it again!
by: okiken108     
10/22/2012 1:25:34 PM
Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Just a clarification, if the gi retails for 219.99 is the correct price 249.99? Is thi to make up shipping or other unseen costs? Thanks.  
by: James Gegenheimer   
10/10/2012 9:35:13 AM
Thanks for that catch James! The price has been fixed to what we had intended.
by: okiken108     
10/10/2012 1:09:39 PM
Was this helpful? (0) (0)
See any errors on this page? Let us know